Payments Platform Conduit Takes Legal Action Against Tether Over $2.76M Freeze
Fintech firm Conduit has filed a lawsuit against Tether to recover $2.76 million in USDT frozen for over a year following a Brazilian investigation.

Cross-border payment infrastructure provider Conduit has initiated formal legal proceedings against stablecoin issuer Tether over frozen USDT tokens. The dispute centers around a corporate treasury wallet holding approximately $2.76 million in USDT that was locked by the stablecoin operator. Conduit asserts that the blacklist action was taken unilaterally in connection with an external Brazilian probe that has no legitimate connection to its business activities.
According to Decrypt, Conduit claims the funds have remained inaccessible for more than twelve months, during which the stablecoin issuer has continued to earn yields on the underlying collateral backing the frozen tokens. The legal action requests a court order compelling the release of the treasury capital, as the prolonged immobilization of working assets has impaired operational settlement speeds for enterprise clients.
Centralized stablecoin issuers retain the technical capability to freeze smart contract addresses on public blockchains, a feature commonly deployed to comply with law enforcement requests and anti-money laundering frameworks. However, corporate users and decentralized finance advocates have frequently raised concerns over the potential for arbitrary lockouts and the absence of rapid dispute resolution mechanisms for legitimate commercial entities.
The outcome of this litigation could set an important legal precedent regarding stablecoin issuer liability and due process requirements when freezing commercial treasury assets. Financial institutions and crypto enterprises will monitor the court's response to determine whether stablecoin providers face stricter evidentiary thresholds before restricting corporate funds.
Key takeaways
- Conduit has sued Tether over $2.76 million in frozen USDT treasury funds.
- The payments company claims the wallet freeze stemmed from an unrelated probe in Brazil.
- The case tests the legal boundaries and responsibilities of centralized stablecoin asset freezes.
